Erudite Banana (sisiphus) wrote in godlessconserve,
Erudite Banana
sisiphus
godlessconserve

The Evolution Sticker

Lawyers: Evolution sticker decision month away; Attornies in case make final arguments; judge to rule


ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- Lawyers fighting a court challenge of evolution disclaimers on textbooks told a federal judge in final arguments Friday that the goal was tolerance. Opponents said the result was unconstitutional support of religion.

U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper said he plans to rule "as quickly as possible" following the weeklong trial in the suburban Cobb County case. Attorneys are still filing paperwork and said any ruling was probably at least a month away.

The suit by parents and the American Civil Liberties Union claims that school officials violated the constitutional separation of church and state in 2002 when they placed disclaimer stickers calling evolution "a theory, not a fact" on high school biology texts.

"The Cobb County school board is doing more than accommodating religion," Michael Manely, an attorney for the parents, argued Friday. "They are promoting religious dogma to all students."

Lawyers for Cobb County disagreed, saying the school board had made a good-faith effort to address questions that inevitably arise during the teaching of evolution.

"Science and religion are related and they're not mutually exclusive," Linwood Gunn said. "This sticker was an effort to get past that conflict and to teach good science."

Stickers followed complaints
The schools placed the stickers after more than 2,000 parents complained the textbooks presented evolution as fact, without mentioning rival ideas about the beginnings of life.

The stickers read, "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."

Manely argued that scientists officially consider all of their ideas theories.

"Maybe we need some more stickers," he said, showing the judge tongue-in-cheek versions questioning gravity and Earth's rotation around the sun.

"Of all the theories in all the world that are taught in Cobb County classrooms, only evolution is disclaimed," he said.

Gunn said religious beliefs make the teaching of evolution different from other science lessons.

"I will grant you there are some people that (a sticker) may create some doubt in their mind," Gunn said. "The fact that it promulgates doubt, if that's true, does not mean that it promotes religion."

The case is one of several battles waged in recent years in the Bible Belt over what role evolution should play in science books. Earlier this year, teachers howled when Georgia's education chief proposed a science curriculum that dropped the word "evolution" in favor of "changes over time." That plan was soon dropped.

***

Bananalysis:

1. Having a sticker blatantly declaring that the Theory of Evolution is a theory, not a fact, is unnecessary, at least as long as teachers are teaching what theories are to their students and not treating science as dogma.

2. The argument by the ACLU that the Cobb County school district "is doing more than accommodating religion" and that "[t]hey are promoting religious dogma to all student" is pure bullshit. The sticker says: This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered. Nowhere does it say, "Believe God over Darwin!"

3. The school district is responding to the community, specifically the parents whose children are being educated in the public schools. "The schools placed the stickers after more than 2,000 parents complained the textbooks presented evolution as fact, without mentioning rival ideas about the beginnings of life." The parents are actively involved in the curriculum, which is only being admonished because they do not automatically buy into the Theory of Evolution. Now, I have already said that it is redundant to put a sticker in a textbook that tells you a theory is a theory, but the sticker is not promoting one line of thought over another, so if it makes parents feel better about the education their children are receiving and that their tax dollars pay for, then let the sticker stay on the textbook.

In sum: "The fact that it promulgates doubt, if that's true, does not mean that it promotes religion."
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 3 comments